Jim wrote on Sep 10th 2001, 22:52:03 about
geeks
Rating: 3 point(s) | Read and rate text individuallyBeing a geek does not carry the same negative connotation it once did.
| Amount of texts to »geeks« | 16, and there are 14 texts (87.50%) with a rating above the adjusted level (-3) |
| Average lenght of texts | 49 Characters |
| Average Rating | 1.063 points, 2 Not rated texts |
| First text | on Aug 29th 2001, 21:24:08 wrote Jim about geeks |
| Latest text | on May 30th 2005, 16:28:41 wrote Bart Starr about geeks |
| Some texts that have not been rated at all
(overall: 2) |
on Sep 12th 2001, 19:05:30 wrote
on Jun 13th 2004, 10:13:16 wrote |
Random associativity, rated above-average positively
Texts to »Geeks«
Sarah wrote on May 26th 2002, 02:12:42 about
geeks
Rating: 4 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
...will one day take over the world.
Oh, wait. We already did!
Jim wrote on Aug 29th 2001, 21:27:12 about
geeks
Rating: 2 point(s) | Read and rate text individuallyChildren should aspire to be geeks. This world needs nothing more than it needs more intelligence.
Jim wrote on Aug 29th 2001, 21:24:08 about
geeks
Rating: 3 point(s) | Read and rate text individuallyGeeks are not social misfits. Geeks are intelligent people with an intellectual focus.
| Some random keywords |
same
ugliness
josh
tattoo
notary
|
| Some random keywords in the german Blaster |
SPULWURM
LaToyaJackson
Nutzen-Gewicht-Relation
wurzelgnom
Maskenfolter
TV
|