>NEW: Info to the keyword have | >discuss | >create link |
on May 6th 2003, 21:11:43, Topical68 wrote the following abouthave |
The classic divide: The haves and have not. What is »had« by the »haves« is not necessarily what is desired by the »have nots«. |
user rating: +22 |
Make this world a better place and enter what you think about »have« into the Assoziations-Blaster's database. |
Configuration | Web-Blaster | Statistics | »have« | FAQ | Home Page | ![]() |
0.0055 (0.0039, 0.0004) sek. 139224055 |