| Amount of texts to »1st« | 26, and there are 25 texts (96.15%) with a rating above the adjusted level (-3) |
| Average lenght of texts | 74 Characters |
| Average Rating | 0.462 points, 4 Not rated texts |
| First text | on Mar 28th 2000, 04:54:00 wrote Alvar about 1st |
| Latest text | on Aug 11th 2007, 21:51:27 wrote alrom about 1st |
| Some texts that have not been rated at all
(overall: 4) |
on May 26th 2000, 13:34:05 wrote
on Apr 11th 2000, 22:29:59 wrote
on Oct 15th 2001, 16:11:41 wrote |
Random associativity, rated above-average positively
Texts to »1st«
1st
Rating: 2 point(s) | Read and rate text individually1st
Rating: 1 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
1st is highly overrated. I can't understand why people are so hung up on firsts is it pioneering spirit, simple greed or aggressive competitiveness that prompts this need to be 1st at stuff?
Firsts are good for something, I suppose. Without firsts, there would be no seconds or subsequents, would there?
1st
Rating: 2 point(s) | Read and rate text individuallyThis is the first text for the first keyword in the english version of the Assoziations-Blaster Mk II
| Some random keywords |
bread
Alder
than
seawolf
furniture
|
| Some random keywords in the german Blaster |
Kreislaufprobleme
zehn
Mädchen-die-einem-Jungen-den-nackten-Po-versohlen
Gelegenheit
beantworten
Eisdrache
tiefstes
|