agnes wrote on Apr 30th 2004, 14:56:54 about
| Amount of texts to »1st« | 26, and there are 25 texts (96.15%) with a rating above the adjusted level (-3) |
| Average lenght of texts | 74 Characters |
| Average Rating | 0.462 points, 4 Not rated texts |
| First text | on Mar 28th 2000, 04:54:00 wrote Alvar about 1st |
| Latest text | on Aug 11th 2007, 21:51:27 wrote alrom about 1st |
| Some texts that have not been rated at all
(overall: 4) |
on Oct 15th 2001, 16:11:41 wrote
on Jul 19th 2001, 00:08:38 wrote
on Apr 11th 2000, 22:29:59 wrote |
Random associativity, rated above-average positively
Texts to »1st«
ozgrrl wrote on Apr 11th 2000, 21:28:19 about
1st
Rating: 1 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
1st is highly overrated. I can't understand why people are so hung up on firsts – is it pioneering spirit, simple greed or aggressive competitiveness that prompts this need to be 1st at stuff?
Firsts are good for something, I suppose. Without firsts, there would be no seconds or subsequents, would there?
Hebjo wrote on Apr 14th 2000, 23:37:35 about
1st
Rating: 1 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
lopez wrote on Dec 25th 2000, 10:17:45 about
1st
Rating: 1 point(s) | Read and rate text individually| Some random keywords |
Amsterdam
interpolate
fragments
has
butthole
|
| Some random keywords in the german Blaster |
Bahnhofstoilette
Ledermann
Dreck
Knax
Bubenpo
hard-core
WillibrordNey
|