Amount of texts to »Polysemy« 9, and there are 9 texts (100.00%) with a rating above the adjusted level (-3)
Average lenght of texts 240 Characters
Average Rating 0.556 points, 3 Not rated texts
First text on Mar 11th 2002, 09:59:32 wrote
Jean-Claude Choul about Polysemy
Latest text on Jan 27th 2009, 19:14:33 wrote
el cojones about Polysemy
Some texts that have not been rated at all
(overall: 3)

on Jan 27th 2009, 19:14:33 wrote
el cojones about Polysemy

on Mar 28th 2005, 16:29:38 wrote
angie about Polysemy

on Jan 27th 2009, 19:14:24 wrote
el cojones about Polysemy

Random associativity, rated above-average positively

Texts to »Polysemy«

Jean-Claude Choul wrote on Mar 11th 2002, 10:26:34 about

Polysemy

Rating: 3 point(s) | Read and rate text individually

Some words have more potential than others for polysemy or polysemic development. »Etiolate« as compared to »Uxorious«, for instance. This is due in part to their combinatorial possibility with other words in creative sentences (as opposed to standard or cliché uses). But even »uxorious« is bisemic, although the dictionary fails to mark the difference between »being excessively fond of« and »being excessively submissive to« (a wife). The test, as always in semantics and linguistics, is substitution. None of the four senses or »fond« can be construed as equivalent to »submissive«. Polysemic potential can be assimilated with the contextual capacity of a word, and can be seen as the application of a given context to the word in question, in a relationship similar to that of argument and predicate.

Jean-Claude Choul wrote on Mar 11th 2002, 09:59:32 about

Polysemy

Rating: 1 point(s) | Read and rate text individually

Polysemy is, according to Webster's Collegiate, the multiplicity of meanings. It is the opposite of monosemy. The word was coined by Michel Bréal, founder of historical semantics, preoccupied, as was his contemporary Antoine Darmesteter, with the evolution of meaning in words. American linguists, often working with utterances, generally speak of lexical ambiguity. But polysemy is a reality, as witnessed by subsenses (usually numbered) in a dictionary entry. Cf. cause, rebellion, rebel (n.& adj.). The vast majority of words are polysemous and, generally speaking, only technical or scientific words are monosemic, at least immediately after being coined or derived. The most abstruse the science or field, the longer monosemy will prevail. Some linguists even suggested that polysemy was paradoxically a sign of meaning depletion, due to frequent uses. Polysemy is especially exploited in poetry and puns.

paxer9999 wrote on Oct 7th 2002, 22:15:33 about

Polysemy

Rating: 1 point(s) | Read and rate text individually

The Polysemy nature of words and/or signs is rooted in the ambiguous and perhaps arbitrary inherent meaning of words and/or signs.

Some random keywords

exist
Created on Sep 3rd 2004, 10:03:37 by Boots Myriad, contains 4 texts

happen
Created on Feb 6th 2001, 23:53:06 by mira, contains 21 texts

clue
Created on Sep 18th 2004, 17:28:41 by rivulet, contains 3 texts

malevolent
Created on Apr 21st 2000, 00:48:50 by alex, contains 10 texts

emotions
Created on Oct 26th 2002, 07:18:26 by crystal, contains 10 texts

Some random keywords in the german Blaster

Morgendämmerung
Created on Apr 27th 2003, 18:32:27 by Delargo, contains 14 texts

Moritz
Created on May 18th 2001, 11:33:35 by Jott., contains 23 texts

AlbertEinstein
Created on Jan 5th 2003, 11:09:04 by Silvio Farina, contains 16 texts

Yuppielutscher
Created on Aug 21st 2001, 06:04:29 by zyn, contains 12 texts

sandig
Created on Jan 7th 2025, 11:32:42 by Muskelmädchen, contains 4 texts

paniert
Created on Nov 30th 2024, 23:33:02 by schmidt, contains 6 texts


The Assoziations-Blaster is a project by Assoziations-Blaster-Team | Deutsche Statistik | 0.0187 Sec. Ugly smelling email spammers: eat this!