Random associativity, rated above-average positively
Texts to »Female-superiority«
Greg wrote on Sep 30th 2003, 08:27:37 about
female-superiority
Rating: 2 point(s) |
Read and rate text individually
When looked at from many different viewpoints one can quickly come to the realization that Females are indeed the superior gender. From the very outset of life to the very end of life there are many factors and evidence that shows just how superior Women are to men. Below you will find some of this proof as well as why I am a true believer in Female Supremacy.
Women carry two x chromosomes, whereas men typically carry one x (sometimes two) and a y chromosome. The y chromosome is smaller and carries less genetic information that the x chromosome does. This, in and of itself might not seem consequential in determining superiority; however it does show that Women's genetic make-up is more complex than men's. Also, the very y chromosome that makes men men also predisposes them to more diseases than Women; such as hemophilia. In fact; Women can be carriers of many things that only affect men such as the aforementioned hemophilia, certain colorblindness and male pattern baldness.
From early on and until menopause Women's primary hormone estrogen protects them from many diseases that men's primary hormone testosterone does not. Men are much more prone to heart-disease and osteoporosis than Women. Although without supplemental hormones after menopause Women will begin to catch up with men in these areas. Men also die sooner and more often than Women in almost every major cause of death. Women also outlive men by an average of seven years.
Women are also more prone to take better care of themselves than men. Women tend to eat better and live a healthier lifestyle than men. Women are on average more organized, and efficient than men.
everybody wrote on Feb 1st 2004, 22:46:24 about
female-superiority
Rating: 3 point(s) |
Read and rate text individually
It's great that more and more people are now comfortable saying this stupid foolishness openly!
B Starr wrote on May 19th 2004, 03:49:17 about
female-superiority
Rating: 1 point(s) |
Read and rate text individually
====================================================
on Mar 25th 2004, 04:19:29, Emma Example wrote the following about
female-superiority
My mother taught me about the superiority of women.
====================================================
And then she drank MY piss!
schmidt wrote on May 1st 2008, 00:45:14 about
female-superiority
Rating: 1 point(s) |
Read and rate text individually
Nor did I like, neither dislike female superiority, there are superiors in all sexes, races and so on and there is the hope that those superiors act to the best of all those inferiors.
This are very big themes, practically not to resolve in a general matter.
Dr. No wrote on Feb 11th 2004, 14:11:21 about
female-superiority
Rating: 3 point(s) |
Read and rate text individually
Sometimes I wonder about these activists who are so outspoken in their crusade for female-superiority. Biggotry is what it is, most of us have learned to recognize it and get past it so we can get on with life. Stop over-compensating for your own guilt.
Emma Example wrote on Feb 11th 2004, 21:34:26 about
female-superiority
Rating: 1 point(s) |
Read and rate text individually
22 i.e. the manner like these interactions in the network of digital discourses carries out themselves, its free shape and availability is the crucial point. The distinction between writing and reading, more exactly said between the documents of writing and reading is first of all medial shifted in digital environments: We can write in the network directly on each page, without having to draw still any tools such as shears, pencil, druckerpresse, because evenly exactly this witnesswitness witness as Tools and programs, when Client are executable Plug in, server programs in the same medium configuration, which are responsible already for displaying the page. The break through-conjugated endlessly by the Dekonstruktivismus that all texts from other texts are together-cut that in each book a further is, which wants out the fact that the texts do not arrive with the readers but as active processprocess processes around the blank characters of the texts, books and discourses around again to constitute exactly, is now in the digital discourses into the code written:
Some random keywords |
starvation
Created on Jun 12th 2000, 20:40:44 by tim, contains 16 texts
puzzle
Created on Dec 31st 2000, 19:44:05 by Silberfinger, contains 12 texts
Tetris
Created on Sep 21st 2003, 19:48:55 by Su Jefe, contains 9 texts
geogaddi
Created on Mar 2nd 2002, 15:00:10 by corey amish, contains 14 texts
salvia
Created on Dec 20th 2002, 00:24:19 by Jim, contains 6 texts
|
Some random keywords in the german Blaster |
Robert-Steinhäuser-Gymnasium
Created on Jun 22nd 2002, 18:13:05 by mwele, contains 41 texts
sonntag
Created on Feb 6th 1999, 17:45:00 by Liamara, contains 211 texts
Jülich
Created on Aug 28th 2007, 12:17:10 by ZAUBERPONY, contains 4 texts
JürgenTrittin
Created on Sep 11th 2003, 23:37:52 by bundestag-report, contains 11 texts
Hommingberger-Gepardenforelle-nach-Müllerinnen-Art
Created on Apr 30th 2005, 19:53:45 by ARD-Ratgeber, contains 5 texts
Assoziationsverfahren
Created on Sep 5th 2003, 23:55:28 by jiegelaber, contains 9 texts
schwarzwaldelch
Created on Feb 2nd 1999, 09:20:19 by Kathrin R., contains 45 texts
|